PokerStars hand replayer
14
Aug

PokerStars fishy million?

Posted by PokerBarney on 11:36AM, 14th Aug 2006
Permalink | Send to a friend |  RSS feed

Another Sunday has passed, and another $1,178,600 was shared out amongst the top 825 players from the original 5893, with first place earning a sweet sweet $173,843.50

Looking at the list of runners and their finishing positions is interesting though. Big names didn't fare so well - JohnnyBax (4458), sheets (3265), shaniac (2241), previous winners Rizen (3745)and goldy18k (4778).

This is to be expected though, with a field of almost 6000 players, it will take a lot of luck to go deep. Especially since these players will be playing to win, so are more likely to bust early (or finish deep).

What is more interesting (and unexpected) however, is having a look at some of the top finishers stats on SharkScope. SharkScope is a searchable database of SNG results, and is worth using to check out your opponents when you get down to the final table.

Anyway.. the winner of the million tourney was DeuxExMachin. He has played 19 SNGs (the last one on the 7th Jun), with an average stake of $36, and average ROI of -2% and a total profit of -$76.

Second place was Kraven23 who has played 180 games, with an average stake of $10, an average ROI of -22% and a total profit of -$849.

Third place was jmega who has played 192 games, with an average stake of $82, an average ROI of -13% and a total profit of -$2,784.

Fourth place was jonath34 who has played 25 games, with an average stake of $27, an average ROI of 14% and a total profit of $125.

Fifth place was Stelvask who has played 379 games, with an average stake of $76, an average ROI of 11% and a total profit of $2,794.

So of the top 5, only 2 are winning players! (according to SharkScope). For third place to have played almost 200 SNGs and to have lost almost $3,000 amazes me. How can he lose so much playing SNGs, yet finish 3rd out of a field of almost 6000 players, with so much at stake?

Of course, SharkScope doesn't take into account MTT results, so we turn to ThePokerDB which does. ThePokerDB is similar to SharkScope, except they store MTT results instead (and you have to register a free account in order to search their database).

Doing a quick search of our top 5 indicates that DeuxExMachin has played 2 large field MTTs, placing 2nd and 5th and winning almost $3,000. jmega also does very well, with total winnings of almost $10,000. jonath34 has made just over £2,000 playing limit Omaha Hi/Lo, and Stelvask has clocked in almost $40,000 with a couple of $10K+ finishes.

Only Kraven23 has had poor MTT results, with winnings of $65 and no final tables since 1st Jan 2005. But what does this all mean?

  • Kraven23 was either very lucky, or has been studying incredibly hard.
  • SharkScope is not a great tool for examing MTT performance (duh...)
  • Being a great MTT player doesn't mean you're great at SNGs and vice versa.
  • jmega is tossing his winnings away on SNGs.. :)
  • Stay away from Stelvask, because he will take your money.

So there you have it. Fish-luckbox-donk-tastic-aments.



Bookmarks

If you enjoyed reading this post, please share it with others at these social bookmarking sites:

Del.icio.us | Digg | Furl | Reddit | Yahoo!
Blogmarks | FeedMeLinks | Shadows | Ma.gnolia
Scuttle | Simpy | Smarking | Spurl

Comments (4)

1. jmega (justindc77 [at] hotmail [dot] com)
Fri 18th Aug 2006 14:40

Hey PokerBarney. I enjoyed reading your writeup. I couldn't agree with you more -- my SNG stats are absolutely atrocious. I have had some great success in MTT's lately though. I'm definitely not a fish, as I do quite well in cash games and MTTs. :) On a side note, I did get incredibly lucky leading up to the final table. I laid a few massive suckouts of people (mostly smaller stacks), and was fortunate enough to finish in the top 3. Keep up the good work bro. Much enjoyed and appreciated.

jmega
2. Sveta (check [at] hotmail [dot] com)
Tue 26th Sep 2006 03:02

very good site! i like it! thanks!o
3. Elza (fdgg [at] hotmail [dot] com)
Tue 26th Sep 2006 10:45

hi, all. nice site...i really like your site ! good job man.m
4. Elza (fdgg [at] hotmail [dot] com)
Wed 11th Oct 2006 08:56

This website is Great! I will recommend you to all my friends. I found so much useful things here. Thank you.

Post a comment

Your name
Your email
Your homepage
Your comment

Every now and then we review a book, piece of software or poker related toy to see how good it really is.

» PokerPlayer Magazine Free Issue

» PokerOffice - Get It Free

» Top 5 Fashion Accessories

» FREE Pokerbility Odds Calculator

» Harrington on Holdem Vol 1

» Read all reviews

Which is your most profitable poker variation when playing online?

Hold 'Em
Omaha
Seven Card Stud
Razz
H.O.R.S.E
Other


29th Jan, by PokerLetter.org
"OMG. That was frickin hilarious. ..."
» If Superheros Played Poker

26th Jan, by v0d00child
"Pokerzone last Monday hosted the first of a series of televised Pokerwize.com 3D Poker events on Sky TV.. This Monday they are hosting another event.. "Take Sport are offering readers the ..."
» 3D Online Poker - The Future?

24th Jan, by tom meny
"lol. Ya, show me those results...."
» Online Poker Is Rigged! Or Not.

9th Jan, by PokerBarney
"Tom, you don't need to be a programmer to hack the site's systems to see the code. Just do an extensive hand analysis - 100,000 should be representative enough. Get hold of something like PokerTracker..."
» Online Poker Is Rigged! Or Not.

9th Jan, by tom meny
"by the way: "Most sites do independant audit and publicise the results. They use government and industry accredited agencies to do so, and this is pretty good in my eyes. " you need to..."
» Online Poker Is Rigged! Or Not.

9th Jan, by tom meny
"no, the difference here from me claiming online poker is rigged, and you claming a teapot is orbiting the earth is that I am NOT THE ONLY ONE claiming that online poker is rigged. Do a search on go..."
» Online Poker Is Rigged! Or Not.